arduino robot  (RobotShop Inc)

Journal: eNeuro

Article Title: A Comparison between Mouse, In Silico , and Robot Odor Plume Navigation Reveals Advantages of Mouse Odor Tracking

doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0212-19.2019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Arduino robot navigation to airborne odor source with honeycomb using Code A with sensors at angle 0° and distance 8 cm. Odor source is middle port (port 2) and start angle is indicated in lower left corner (135°, 190°, and 225°). Video recorded at 30 Hz and played back at 90 Hz.

Article Snippet: We purchased and modified an Arduino robot (Extended Data Fig. 4-1 A ; Arduino robot, code: A000078, Arduino was purchased from Robotshop).

Techniques:

Journal: eNeuro

Article Title: A Comparison between Mouse, In Silico , and Robot Odor Plume Navigation Reveals Advantages of Mouse Odor Tracking

doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0212-19.2019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Arduino robot navigation to airborne odor source with honeycomb using Code A with sensors at angle 45° and distance 8 cm. Odor source is middle port (port 2) and start angle is indicated in lower left corner (135°, 190°, and 225°). Video recorded at 30 Hz and played back at 90 Hz.

Article Snippet: We purchased and modified an Arduino robot (Extended Data Fig. 4-1 A ; Arduino robot, code: A000078, Arduino was purchased from Robotshop).

Techniques:

Journal: eNeuro

Article Title: A Comparison between Mouse, In Silico , and Robot Odor Plume Navigation Reveals Advantages of Mouse Odor Tracking

doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0212-19.2019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Arduino robot navigation to airborne odor source with honeycomb using Code A with sensors at angle 0° and distance 16 cm. Odor source is middle port (port 2) and start angle is indicated in lower left corner (135°, 190°, and 225°). Video recorded at 30 Hz and played back at 90 Hz.

Article Snippet: We purchased and modified an Arduino robot (Extended Data Fig. 4-1 A ; Arduino robot, code: A000078, Arduino was purchased from Robotshop).

Techniques:

Journal: eNeuro

Article Title: A Comparison between Mouse, In Silico , and Robot Odor Plume Navigation Reveals Advantages of Mouse Odor Tracking

doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0212-19.2019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Arduino robot navigation to airborne odor source with honeycomb using Code A with sensors at angle 45° and distance 16 cm. Odor source is middle port (port 2) and start angle is indicated in lower left corner (135°, 190°, and 225°). Video recorded at 30 Hz and played back at 90 Hz.

Article Snippet: We purchased and modified an Arduino robot (Extended Data Fig. 4-1 A ; Arduino robot, code: A000078, Arduino was purchased from Robotshop).

Techniques:

Journal: eNeuro

Article Title: A Comparison between Mouse, In Silico , and Robot Odor Plume Navigation Reveals Advantages of Mouse Odor Tracking

doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0212-19.2019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Arduino robot navigation to airborne odor source using code B with sensors at angle 0° and distance 8 cm. Odor source is middle port (port 2), start angle is indicated in lower left corner (135°, 190°, and 225°), condition indicated in lower left corner (honeycomb and no honeycomb). Video recorded at 30 Hz and played back at 90 Hz.

Article Snippet: We purchased and modified an Arduino robot (Extended Data Fig. 4-1 A ; Arduino robot, code: A000078, Arduino was purchased from Robotshop).

Techniques:

Journal: eNeuro

Article Title: A Comparison between Mouse, In Silico , and Robot Odor Plume Navigation Reveals Advantages of Mouse Odor Tracking

doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0212-19.2019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Arduino robot navigation to airborne odor source using code B with sensors at angle 45° and distance 8 cm. Odor source is middle port (port 2), start angle is indicated in lower left corner (135°, 190°, and 225°), condition indicated in lower left corner (honeycomb and no honeycomb). Video recorded at 30 Hz and played back at 90 Hz.

Article Snippet: We purchased and modified an Arduino robot (Extended Data Fig. 4-1 A ; Arduino robot, code: A000078, Arduino was purchased from Robotshop).

Techniques:

Journal: eNeuro

Article Title: A Comparison between Mouse, In Silico , and Robot Odor Plume Navigation Reveals Advantages of Mouse Odor Tracking

doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0212-19.2019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Arduino robot navigation to airborne odor source using code B with sensors at angle 0° and distance 16 cm. Odor source is middle port (port 2), start angle is indicated in lower left corner (135°, 190°, and 225°), condition indicated in lower left corner (honeycomb and no honeycomb). Video recorded at 30 Hz and played back at 90 Hz.

Article Snippet: We purchased and modified an Arduino robot (Extended Data Fig. 4-1 A ; Arduino robot, code: A000078, Arduino was purchased from Robotshop).

Techniques:

Journal: eNeuro

Article Title: A Comparison between Mouse, In Silico , and Robot Odor Plume Navigation Reveals Advantages of Mouse Odor Tracking

doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0212-19.2019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Arduino robot navigation to airborne odor source using code B with sensors at angle 45° and distance 16 cm. Odor source is middle port (port 2), start angle is indicated in lower left corner (135°, 190°, and 225°), condition indicated in lower left corner (honeycomb and no honeycomb). Video recorded at 30 Hz and played back at 90 Hz.

Article Snippet: We purchased and modified an Arduino robot (Extended Data Fig. 4-1 A ; Arduino robot, code: A000078, Arduino was purchased from Robotshop).

Techniques:

Journal: eNeuro

Article Title: A Comparison between Mouse, In Silico , and Robot Odor Plume Navigation Reveals Advantages of Mouse Odor Tracking

doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0212-19.2019

Figure Lengend Snippet: Arduino-based robot navigation varies based on start position and odor environment complexity. A , Robot odor navigation flow chamber, modifications to the SOL. Solid arrows represent five starting angles. Odor ports were coupled to LED lights detected by sensors on the robot (indicated by dotted red arrows). B , Performance (average % successful trials over 8 and 16 cm and 0° and 45° gas sensor distance and angles, respectively) across codes (left). Performance based on gas sensor distance and angle for the honeycomb condition (right). C , Example trajectories from 180° (magenta) starting position in A for honeycomb and no honeycomb condition. D , Performance (average % successful trials over 8 and 16 cm and 0° and 45° gas sensor distance and angles, respectively) with the honeycomb based on starting angle and rewarded port for Code A (left) and Code B (right). Bars are color coded and labeled according to the starting angles in A . E , Robot overall linearity score with honeycomb and without honeycomb using Code B. Plot shows data combined over sensor angle and sensor distance for each odor environment condition (left). Linearity score across starting angles and target ports with and without the honeycomb. All plots show mean ± SEM, n = 4 sessions. See also Extended Data . * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.

Article Snippet: We purchased and modified an Arduino robot (Extended Data Fig. 4-1 A ; Arduino robot, code: A000078, Arduino was purchased from Robotshop).

Techniques: Labeling